Truth Matters

How Medill alumni are getting the facts – and not backing down – to serve the public interest

Peter Alexander holding a microphone extends his hand while speaking

Peter Alexander asking a question at a White House press briefing. Credit: NBC News

Peter Alexander asking a question at a White House press briefing. Credit: NBC News

By Lauren Manning (BSJ13)

Telling the truth is riskier, and all the more vital, in today’s era of cratering public confidence in media and threat of censorship and press intimidation in both offline and digital spaces. But Medill alumni are working to meet this high stakes, complex moment. Whether they’re setting strategy for state-level public radio, reporting culturally relevant content for multi-national audiences, or serving as a member of the White House press corps.

These reflections, shared in late spring and early summer 2025, highlight their perspectives and purpose.

At a time where many journalists appear to be sprinting on shifting ground, Medill’s graduates are exploring creative ways to build trust with audience members, stand up for facts, and arm their audiences with the information citizens need to make decisions about their own lives.

Peter Alexander: An Advocate for the Facts in a Shifting Media Landscape

In his more than two decades at NBC News, Peter Alexander (BSJ98) has covered wars from Afghanistan to Iraq, visited the sites of natural disasters, and reported from the presidential campaign trail and lawn of the White House. Wherever his work takes him, and in all the complexity that it brings, Alexander’s core priority remains getting to the facts and serving the public interest.

“As a White House correspondent, I'm not an advocate for Democrats or for Republicans, I'm an advocate for the facts,” he says. “And now more than ever, when the facts are often under assault, our responsibility is even greater.”

Standing up for the facts, he notes, means balancing chasing scoops, having a depth of knowledge of any number of topics, and upholding rigorous editorial standards. Before content is aired, the NBC News team follows a robust process of fact checking and collaboration—bringing together legal, standards, and senior production teams. They also ensure “the little facts,” as Alexander calls them, such as accurate spelling and formatting of text on a graphic or a chyron. Small details are just as important as the “big ones” at a time where every decision can build or erode trust with audience members.

Peter Alexander questioning President Trump on the lawn

Peter Alexander questioning President Trump. Credit: NBC News

Peter Alexander questioning President Trump. Credit: NBC News

President Biden speaks to reporter Peter Alexander during a press conference

Peter Alexander questioning President Biden. Credit: NBC News

Peter Alexander questioning President Biden. Credit: NBC News

“We're not perfect—we're human—but we will do everything in our power to get as close to the facts as we can due to the breadth of our reporting, our collaboration, and what we witness ourselves,” he said.

This commitment is rooted in his Medill education as well.

“As a student at Medill, my final project focused on the higher obligation of the news media to get it right. And to this day, I still stand by that responsibility, which really is at the heart of what we as a nation as journalists do every day,” Alexander said.

In today’s fragmented information landscape, Alexander and his NBC teammates work to be “forward leaning.” This means distributing content across traditional and emerging platforms to meet audiences where they are and accepting that correspondents are “no longer just appearing on the day or nightly news.”

A person, Peter Alexander, walks next to the White House while also looking down at a phone

Peter Alexander on his way to the White House. Credit: NBC News

Peter Alexander on his way to the White House. Credit: NBC News

As NBC News’ chief White House correspondent, Alexander routinely parses a rapid-fire stream of statements in real time. A striking example involved a viral exchange in which he fact-checked a White House claim about social security fraud. In this exchange Alexander probed White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt for evidence of this fraud, following his own review of related documentations. Fraud, he notes, is a crime and not the same as wasteful spending, which is defined by one’s perception.

A video of the conversation gained millions of views—prompting a wave of messages from viewers who saw the clip on social media, including those who may have never seen his reporting before. These digital touchpoints offer an opportunity to make journalism matter to a new generation of information consumers.

“The technology can change,” Alexander says. “But our mission, our responsibility, doesn’t.”

A frequent speaker with current Medill students and early career alumni, Alexander also describes inspiring others to be a regular motivation.

“I tell young people, I’m just keeping the seat warm until it’s your turn,” he adds, reminding storytellers to ask, even when it feels intimidating.

“The worst anyone can do is say no,” he says. “It’s the advice I got from my parents that served me through journalism school and serves me to this day.” He recalls how some of his most memorable interviews—including with Fidel Castro in Cuba and renowned basketball player Yao Ming during the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics—only happened because he pushed for an interview.

Despite the pressures of the job, Alexander remains energized by its exhausting yet exhilarating possibilities.

“Journalism is not just a career, it's a calling, a lifestyle really, and a responsibility to hold those in power to account and always to advocate for the facts,” he says.
Peter Alexander speaking to President Trump

Peter Alexander speaks with President Trump. Credit: NBC News

Peter Alexander speaks with President Trump. Credit: NBC News

Julie Pace: The AP’s Global Playbook for Defending the Facts

For Julie Pace (BSJ04) defending press freedom is not a new endeavor—it's core to her work. From her years as a White House and political reporter, and as the Washington bureau chief for the Associated Press (AP), to her current role overseeing global operations as the AP’s executive editor, Pace has witnessed firsthand how journalism evolves under pressure.

Pace’s shift from reporting to management and leadership has only deepened her respect for journalism’s resilience. She describes the AP’s work globally—and its rich 179 year history—as “nothing short of a minor miracle” that lends perspective to how journalists continue to persist even when under threat.

“I don’t think there’s a region in the world right now where we are not facing … some level of threat to media and press,” she said, citing a variety of ways journalists and media outlets adapt in order to continue their reporting.

For example, a first step is often understanding the legal protections journalists are meant to have in each location and the appropriate pathways for upholding their rights aligned with local laws. This can also mean collaborating with other news organizations to navigate difficult media environments together.

“There is power in numbers when multiple organizations come together to advocate for press freedom … and push back on particular actions. Being able to do that really quickly is one of the things we learned,” she adds, noting the essential interplay between trust and safety for reporters, their sources, and with peer media organizations. The AP also invests in digital safety and may even pull “reporters out of a country entirely so they can keep covering it from a safer place.”

A person, Julie Pace, wearing a pink blouse and dark suit speaks to an audience while sitting in a chair

AP Executive Editor Julie Pace speaks at the Aspen Ideas Festival on June 30, 2025. (Nick Tininenko/Aspen Institute)

AP Executive Editor Julie Pace speaks at the Aspen Ideas Festival on June 30, 2025. (Nick Tininenko/Aspen Institute)

Aspects of this playbook are increasingly relevant even where freedom of the press is constitutionally mandated, such as the United States. For instance, in February 2025, the AP was barred by the White House from participating in the press pool and covering President Donald Trump in certain spaces. This was after the editorial decision to continue referring to the Gulf of Mexico in its coverage by its original name, despite President Trump’s issuing of an executive order to rename the body of water the Gulf of America. According to the AP’s official style guidance, the order carries authority only within the United States. As other countries and international bodies do not have to recognize the name change, AP’s guidance states to refer to the body of water by its original name while acknowledging the new name Trump has chosen.

A troubling trend, this scenario is hardly the first time a government has asked independent news organizations to change their wording according to Pace. This case remains ongoing as of writing.

“It’s really important that we make clear that we are not going to bend to political pressure. Unfortunately, that left us in a situation in the U.S. where we really had no choice but to go to court on it,” she said. “When it became clear that the only resolution was for us to change our editorial style, that was a line we couldn’t cross. This wasn’t just about us. It was about ensuring that no government can retaliate over language or facts they don’t like.”

“Building trust is a lot about transparency,” she explains.

Beyond defending press freedom through the courts, Pace and her team are urgently focused on rebuilding public trust by leaning into the AP’s mission to serve their diverse and global audience.

“Building trust is a lot about transparency,” she explains. Simple yet concrete steps include explaining how a story was chosen and pairing bylines with short biographies that better demonstrate a reporter’s expertise on a particular topic—whether it be economic policy or a beloved baseball team.

“We try to explain our work, how we make decisions about stories, why we picked certain stories, why we use certain styles.”

Her advice to others? Stand firm in your principles and remember who the work is for.

“This is about all the independent media outlets who are there to hold politicians and other powerful interests accountable, to be in the room and ask the questions for the public,” she says. “[Journalism] is a real public service and there’s a real mission behind it.”

Omar Jimenez: On Staying Human and Finding Power through Pressure

Within a news cycle often defined by urgency and unpredictability, CNN anchor Omar Jimenez (BSJ15) believes the core of good journalistic practice remains unchanged: navigate the pressure and stay close to the truth.

Reflecting on a defining chapter of his career, Jimenez recalls the myriad weights that came with leading his network’s coverage of the 2020 murder of George Floyd, the related protests, and the ensuing trials. In reporting from a public street in Minneapolis, Jimenez and his team had been “doing what we had been doing for days” when they experienced direct intimidation from law enforcement while covering the news live.

“Just having the presence of the state patrol officers right around us, even having one of their hands on my arm as I was reporting, you could argue that was a form of intimidation. But it clearly took a step to the next level when we were actually put into handcuffs and led away,” he said.

A person, Omar Jimenez, wearing a brown shirt walks and speaks while moving through a parking lot in front of a low building

Omar Jimenez reporting in Panama outside a shelter housing migrants expelled from the United States.

Omar Jimenez reporting in Panama outside a shelter housing migrants expelled from the United States.

Jimenez continues to observe similar tensions with other powerholders and believes journalists in the United States and around the world need to “expect a fight” on anything they publish.

“People follow the example of the President of the United States in many cases, and, you know, to see how the press is treated by that president, other [leaders] will at the very least be taking notes,” he said.

While a troubling trend, Jimenez is optimistic that such pressures will lead to even more diligent and attentive reporters. His strategy is to connect better with audience members and prioritize leading with authenticity. This includes leaning into his lived experiences during the pitch process. For example, Jimenez notes how his tenure playing basketball at Northwestern helped propel a recent pitch about college athlete experiences. Similarly, on immigration policy, he uses his father’s history immigrating from Colombia to the United States as a motivator and strategy to humanize policy complexities for his followers and viewers. A 90-second face-to-camera explainer for social media contextualized his television story about migrant deportations to Panama, reaching more viewers in a digital, audience savvy way while staying true to fact-based, well-reported information.

Omar Jimenez stands looking into the distance at nightfall

Omar Jimenez preparing for a live report in New Hampshire. Credit: Chorus Photography

Omar Jimenez preparing for a live report in New Hampshire. Credit: Chorus Photography

Jimenez believes that deeper engagement with his viewers builds trust in his reporting and the media ecosystem in general. In turn, it drives influence through the power of human connection, supporting audience members to understand the implications of current events all the more.

“When [a story] is crazy, you cover the crazy. When it’s calm, you cover the nuance and the calm. When it’s complicated, you break down the complicated into something more digestible,” he says. “To me, in chaos lies opportunity.”
Two people converse on television

Omar Jimenez interviews Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine as part of his “Why Springfield?” episode of The Whole Story with Anderson Cooper. Credit: CNN

Omar Jimenez interviews Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine as part of his “Why Springfield?” episode of The Whole Story with Anderson Cooper. Credit: CNN

Chris Casquejo: A Global Voice Practices Resilience Under Threat

Chris Casquejo felt a mix of shock and surprise by the outpouring of support from affiliate news organizations and media consumers that he collaborates with across Asia. This was in mid-March 2025, when over 1,000 staff at Voice of America (VOA) were first placed on administrative leave.

“In many ways, they took the news harder than I did, because to them, Voice of America is such a brand. In certain parts of the world, it's on par with Al Jazeera, CNN International, and the BBC in terms of a trusted media organization,” he notes. “To me, that was really hard to fathom given that we have such a smaller budget than all these global media organizations.”

VOA is an international broadcasting network funded by the U.S. federal government via Congressional approval. Since its creation during World War II, VOA has enjoyed legally-mandated editorial independence and played an important role providing consistent and accurate reporting to an audience of primarily non-Americans living abroad. Many of its audience members live in regions with historically and presently tight media control.

Casquejo, host and correspondent of VOA’s English to Asia affiliate news service, joined the agency in 2021. He describes his small team as a “de facto Washington bureau” for a range of media affiliates in South and Southeast Asia who are unable to base their correspondents in Washington, D.C. on a full-time basis. Casquejo credits his team’s dedicated and timely reporting, despite the significant time difference between the United States and Asia, as core contributors to their positive reputation.

“They counted on us to get comprehensive coverage of all these major events that were happening,” he said. “And we gave it to them.”

Key stories include fact-based reporting of former President Joe Biden’s meetings with Chinese leader Xi Jinping at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation conference and primary coverage of the 2024 U.S. general election.

“What's missing now is the coverage of everything that's happening with the Trump administration,” he said, reflecting that decades of trust built with media consumers has been shaken since the VOA network went dark in March. “I personally don’t know what they’re airing in our slots. The worry is that because there are so many content gaps to fill, [affiliate stations] are going to rely on Russian and Chinese sources, which are … state run media that toe their government lines. Voice of America was never that.”

What is also missing is VOA’s human interest coverage about the permeation of Asia’s cultures and tradition in the United States. For example, some favorite stories of Casquejo’s go well beyond politics. This includes highlighting historical and emerging culinary legacies, such as Detroit’s Chinatown and the proliferation of ube, a Filipino purple yam, amongst American consumers.

Despite his inability to speak specifically to the ongoing legal cases regarding VOA, Casquejo is clear about the stakes. He’s been focusing his energies on supporting colleagues who are U.S. visa holders, including those who may face safety risks if they return to their country of origin, or who may not have previously experienced the professional uncertainty of being let go before.

As of early June, the newest proposed restructuring for VOA would leave the smallest viable number of employees in place to comply with a judge’s order.

A person, Chris Casquejo, prepares to give a report in front of a camera

Chris Casquejo preparing to report from the UN General Assembly in September 2024. (Courtesy of Chris Casquejo)

Chris Casquejo preparing to report from the UN General Assembly in September 2024. (Courtesy of Chris Casquejo)

A person, Chris Casquejo, reports on camera dressed in a suit

Chris Casquejo on camera for Voice of America's Asia Weekly, providing context and updates on some of the biggest stories from the region in around three minutes. (Courtesy of Chris Casquejo)

Chris Casquejo on camera for Voice of America's Asia Weekly, providing context and updates on some of the biggest stories from the region in around three minutes. (Courtesy of Chris Casquejo)

Sabrina Siddiqui: Facing Power Holders through Political Reporting

For Wall Street Journal reporter Sabrina Siddiqui (BSJ08), covering American politics has always been about holding power to account through day-to-day persistence and presence. She has covered three U.S. presidential administrations and four general election cycles for a variety of publications and is no stranger to tough conversations with political staffers.

But, while a reporter’s job is to hold any administration accountable, she adds that that can be easier said than done.

“It's not only the Trump administration where it's complicated. There's always an effort by any administration to shape the narrative and … try to exert some control on how a story will ultimately look. You just have to hold your ground. You have your reporting and you're giving them the opportunity to comment,” she said.

One experience that stands out the most is how the media has historically enjoyed significant access to American lawmakers. When covering Congress, for example, she became familiar with staking out meetings and walking directly up to an elected official for a statement. Even when challenging to get an official off script, the opportunity to pose questions to lawmakers so directly is something she views as uniquely American, compared to what reporters in some other countries have shared with her about their own experiences.

A person, Sabrina Siddiqui, in a coat walks in front of an airplane while both are on the tarmac

Sabrina Siddiqui during her travels with President Biden as a White House correspondent for The Wall Street Journal. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)

Sabrina Siddiqui during her travels with President Biden as a White House correspondent for The Wall Street Journal. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)

That perspective deepened when Siddiqui found herself the subject of international attention after asking Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi a pointed question about his human rights record during a joint press conference with President Biden. While a joint press conference is traditional of foreign leaders when they visit the United States, Siddiqui notes “Prime Minister Modi’s history of not taking questions,” especially unscripted, from the press.

In a negotiated break from precedent, both governments determined that just one question would be asked by a member of the U.S. press corps and another by the Indian foreign press. Siddiqui was selected, which she believes to be due in part to her experiences covering foreign policy and her Indian-Pakistani heritage. This aligned with the Biden administration’s practice of engaging reporters, where possible, who share identity characteristics with the visiting global leader.

While she expected some reaction, she underestimated the magnitude of a targeted, conspiratorial, and coordinated “avalanche of harassment and backlash towards me and my question.”

“I remember an [independent] Indian journalist who tweeted at that time how remarkable it was to see how the institutions within the U.S. were standing behind me. Who's ever going to stand behind them at home?,” she said. “It was definitely a motivator to keep going and to not second guess myself or my work. That's exactly what the harassment campaign was about: to try and intimidate me and frame it as if I was acting out of bias, not acting as a journalist.”

A person, Sabrina Siddiqui, speaks into a microphone

Wall Street Journal reporter Sabrina Siddiqui asking Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi questions at a press conference at the White House on June 22, 2023. (Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters)

Wall Street Journal reporter Sabrina Siddiqui asking Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi questions at a press conference at the White House on June 22, 2023. (Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters)

Despite the experience, Siddiqui remained committed to her job. She acknowledges those who defended her right to ask questions such as the D.C.-based journalism community, The Wall Street Journal, the White House press office, National Security Council spokespeople and a variety of other media coalitions. The support of these institutions reinforced her decision to continue doing her work, even if it meant taking further safety precautions.

For example, she decided not to visit India to cover President Biden’s attendance at the G20 Summit three months later, citing security concerns and uncertainty. “I don't think we were necessarily concerned that I would be detained or in prison, but at the same time, we were in such uncharted territory that anything could happen,” she said about the decision making process. At the time, fellow Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich was imprisoned in Russia on charges of espionage.

That blend of conviction and caution is ever present as Siddiqui returns to reporting following the recent birth of her second child.

“We are working professionals, and we are doing our job, a constitutionally protected job,” she said. “When you are attacking a journalist, just for the sake of attacking them online, this is a real person. I think the thing with social media … is that people don't always realize that you're talking about a real person who has a family, who has a life.”

There is a line, she notes, between thoughtful critique and being threatening.

“People are welcome to like or dislike our coverage. They should criticize our coverage if they think it falls short. We also obviously are an industry that has to be introspective. If people feel like our reporting is missing the mark, why is that?,” she says. “But there's still a difference between that and a climate of harassment.”

- Sabrina Siddiqui -

Duchesne Drew: Stewarding Trust in Tumultuous Times through Public Media

Duchesne Drew (MSJ94) has been on a mission rooted in inclusion, rigor, and public service since his early days as an education reporter.

“I spent a lot of time in classrooms as well as in spreadsheets and databases, trying to understand patterns,” he said. “ ... looking for both signs of hope and things we should do more of, and also signs of dysfunction and things we should stop doing or scale back.”

This hands-on work is “the heart” of what still guides Drew’s journalistic practice today. Following a rich community-focused career at the Minnesota Star Tribune and the St. Paul-based Bush Foundation, Drew joined Minnesota Public Radio (MPR) as president in 2020. Now at the helm of one of the largest public radio operations in the United States, he is responsible for content-related decision making that serves both Minnesotans and millions of other listeners around the country.

A person, Duchesne Drew, is wearing a blue suit coat and smiling

Duchesne Drew

Duchesne Drew

“We have the ability to give [our neighbors] the information they need to make better decisions and to give, hopefully, a sense of agency within that,” he said.

Much of MPR’s decision-making goes beyond breaking the news. It’s about music from Prince, to pipe organs, to Latin fusion and Afrobeats—building on Minnesota’s rich artistic history and elevating both popular and overlooked artists. It is about adapting content to reach new and younger listeners, who may not turn on the radio but who will consume podcasts, stream content, and engage with social media channels. It is about weekly segments on books, or for creating space for discourse and skill development. For example, Talking Sense, an initiative developed in the lead up to the 2024 elections, centers on helping people have civil, constructive conversations across differences on topics from incarceration to same-sex marriage.

“We are not just pushing information out, but also receiving and giving people space to share,” Drew said. “You can't do that well if you're only capturing and projecting a sliver of who we actually are.”

To achieve this, MPR regularly hosts roundtables and attends community events to gain insight into listener perspectives, using the insights to shape new and refine known projects. “[Reporters] need to do the hard work of getting out of your own lane, your own patterns, and seeking out people who may have different perspectives and histories than you do,” he adds.

Whether from listeners in towns that border Canada to population dense areas like the Twin Cities and amongst the state’s diverse East African, Hmong, and indigenous communities, Drew sees listener support as an investment in shared values and responsibility but also in financial resilience. He makes operational decisions to ensure these contributors can feel seen and valued in the station’s content offerings. In turn, nearly two-thirds of MPR’s funding comes from individual donors and enables the platform to keep creating and delivering  content and events for free.

“People who are members of the public choose to invest in us so that we can provide news, information, music, and cultural programming not just to them but to their neighbors and to people they will never, ever meet,” he said.

Still, as of mid-2025, MPR faced the potential to lose millions of dollars in funding. This is due to the White House request to Congress to repeal over $1 billion in funding to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) and the knock-on impact on MPR’s agreements with smaller outlets that rely more heavily on CPB funding to license content that MPR distributes. This includes content such as BBC programming through MPR’s national arm, American Public Media.

“I think we're being tested,” he said, stressing the opportunity for journalists and the wider public to strengthen our collection muscle to protect the media. “What we have we should not take for granted. What we have doesn't exist everywhere. I think there are a lot of people who recognize it's important to protect and support.”
Two people stand onstage and address an audience in front of MPR News banners

Duchesne Drew and his wife, Angela Davis, at an MPR spring event about the latest season of Love is Blind, which featured participants from Minneapolis-St. Paul. Davis hosts a daily news call-in show on MPR News.

Duchesne Drew and his wife, Angela Davis, at an MPR spring event about the latest season of Love is Blind, which featured participants from Minneapolis-St. Paul. Davis hosts a daily news call-in show on MPR News.

Lauren Manning (BSJ13) is a strategic communicator and behavioral scientist. She works around the world facilitating communities and organizations to design solutions to protect human rights and democracy and promote civic action. Lauren studied journalism, sociology, and civic engagement at Northwestern and public policy at the University of Chicago, grounding her work in both evidence generation and community voice.

 

Discover more
Read from the current issue, explore the Medill Alumni Magazine, or visit Medill.